![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/image-181.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nPlease ask our environmental organizations to provide basic information on what pesticides the national parks are spraying. This is the kind of stuff I find all over the place. A decision made by the EPA in 2022 (BTW under Biden \ud83d\udc38)<\/p>\n “AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2022\/09\/16\/2022-20040\/oxirane-2-methyl–polymer-with-oxirane-mono-c9-11-isoalkyl-ethers-c10-rich-phosphates-potassium#:~:text=AGENCY%3A,when%20applied%20to%20livestock.<\/a><\/p>\n Hmmmmmm. And thirdly it’s use in “pre- and post-harvest as well as in formulations applied to livestock<\/strong>” without better documentation is sad.\u00a0 And exactly why a half dozen forever chemicals were listed as “inert” 2 years ago. These forever chemicals probably had waivers as well<\/p>\n And on another matter I also do not believe that the national park service should be hiding the pesticide use in _Our_ _National_ _Lands_ . Give us _full_ access to the PUPS (pesticide use proposal system) database. Our national parks should not be Bayer, Dow chemical, and the rest of the chemical industries personal playground.<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/what-can-anyone-do-about-the-pesticide-use-in-our-national-parks\/<\/a> I believe it is more important than the political parties convincing you that the next 4 years will make all the difference in the world<\/strong>. I believe it is more important than politicians from both sides who say one thing and do another.<\/p>\n People have completely and utterly lost control over the massive numbers of chemical toxins and their environments and they’ve lost control because they handed this over to politicians and PR Departments.<\/p>\n And if you don’t believe in the power of manipulation watch at least the last half of this. If you want to help keep our children and grandchildren from being poisoned you must decide whether or not to do something active about it. I believe that enough of us contacting our environmental organizations and convincing them to once again _be environmental organizations_ is the most important thing we can do in this world. I believe that there are actually just three easy things that we can do to significantly better the world, protect vulnerable humans and creatures from chemical atrocities. OTNP June 2025 Good morning lovely people. If you want to help keep our children and grandchildren from being poisoned you must decide whether or not to do something active about it. Please ask our environmental organizations to provide basic … Continue reading
\nhttps:\/\/chng.it\/9Dj4vKwbK5<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/just-three-easy-steps\/<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n
\nEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA).<\/p>\n
\nFinal rule.<\/p>\n
\nThis regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono-C9-11-isoalkyl ethers, C10-rich, phosphates, potassium salts (CAS Reg. No. 2275654-37-8), when used as an inert ingredient (surfactant, related adjuvants of surfactant) in pesticide formulations used pre- and post-harvest as well as in formulations applied to livestock. Spring Regulatory Sciences, on behalf of Nouryon Chemicals LLC (USA), submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a tolerance for residues of oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono-C9-11-isoalkyl ethers, C10-rich, phosphates, potassium salts (CAS Reg. No. 2275654-37-8), on food or feed commodities or when applied to livestock.”<\/p>\n
\nFirst of all I don’t agree that
\noxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono-C9-11-isoalkyl ethers, C10-rich, phosphates, potassium salts<\/em> …
\nis, as the final decision above states, “inert<\/strong>.” I also don’t believe that it should be sprayed on your organic produce<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
\nAnd; more importantly, I don’t believe that it should be granted a waiver that “eliminates the need to establish a tolerance for residues<\/strong>” of it.\u00a0 (Info) “A tolerance is a maximum permissible level of a pesticide residue that can legally be present in or on food.”
\n“The EPA can grant an exemption if it determines that [the chemical] will pose no hazard to the public health.
\n“The EPA [must have] enough data to assess the risks of the pesticide and conclude that no harm will result from the residue, even without a specific tolerance level.” —Wouldn’t you like to see that data?<\/p>\n
\n
\nThere are many people that will look at this and roll their eyes; even my friends, but I believe that the uncontrolled chemical explosion that has happened in the past 60 years is one of the greatest threats to this nation, our children, and our future.<\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/youtu.be\/qDkHCaNAo_w?si=fjTgUObFZ9lrnV2W<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/just-three-easy-steps\/<\/a><\/p>\nFor past OTNP (#_OTNP on X) issues.
\nhttps:\/\/www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/past-ourtoxicnationalparks-posts\/<\/a><\/h5>\nBut you may want to start here. www.puravidaaquatic.com\/wordpress\/why-i-started-this\/<\/a><\/h6>\n
If you have received this as a forward and would like to continue receiving it please email me “vidaaquatic@gmail.com”<\/a>
\nAnd if you would like to donate as little as $5 to the cause, you can Zelle it to vidaaquatic@gmail.com. thank you very much. Bob<\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"